The Transportation Security Administration is the governing body overseeing airport security, which includes the use of mass scanning devices. The TSA has spent more than $1 billion on the X-ray backscatter machines at airports, and “hundreds of thousands” of public comments have been submitted to the TSA on the matter.

It was only a matter of time before the Supreme Court handed down its decision whether or not the Federal Aviation Administration will be able to impose a new rule that mandates all airline pilots to wear their goggles and masks while on duty. The FAA has claimed that this new rule is necessary to protect airline employees from exposure to contaminants (i.e. germs, viruses, dust and smoke) in the air, but it is the American Federation of Government Employees who are fighting this rule.

Justice Thomas Will Decide Whether To Halt The Airline Mask Mandate

Judge Thomas rules on the abolition of compulsory masks on aircraft

Gary Leff 13. July 2024

Last month, I reported on a lawsuit filed by passengers seeking to overturn the federal transportation masking mandate. Some of the arguments in the complaint are legally persuasive, but the complaint also contains many inconclusive allegations. I expected the case to be dismissed due to the expiration (and not extension) of the mask’s term at 13. September 2024 would no longer be relevant – before the case had been tried.

Since then, however, several events have taken place.

  • First, the Supreme Court found it compelling that the CDC exceeded its authority when it ordered the tenant’s eviction. The same arguments regarding the CDC’s legislative authority behind the TSA mask mandate apply here.
  • Second, the passenger who sought the mask mandate sought a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court took up a request for a preliminary injunction and referred it to Judge Thomas. It will decide whether to suspend the federal mandate on transportation masking pending further consideration of the case.

Justice Thomas seems reasonably persuaded by the substantive argument that the CDC’s statutory authority to adopt and implement regulations … necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of infectious diseases from foreign states to states or possessions, or from one state or possession to another state or possession, is limited to the types of activities specified in the Act,

inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest control, destruction of animals or objects so infected or contagious that they could be a source of infection dangerous to persons, and any other action which he considers necessary.

And that any interpretation of the CDC’s authority that is not limited in this way would run into non-delegation problems (Congress cannot give the agency a blank check).

However – and many readers will know better than I do about these matters – after the winter victory. The Natural Resources Defense Council finds it difficult to imagine that plaintiff Lucas Wall could prove the likelihood of irreparable harm without an injunction (which he would have to wait until September if the government indicates it sees no way to extend the current rule), and even if he did prove irreparable harm, he would still have to weigh it against the public interest in the rule.

Therefore, I would be surprised if Wall prevails and gets a court order from Judge Thomas – and if that order is national rather than narrowly tailored to the plaintiff (and others in the same situation).

Since the CDC recommends that vaccinated persons not wear masks indoors and mRNA vaccines continue to prove highly effective against current variants of the virus, the risk of transmission is largely concentrated in unvaccinated persons. Anyone 12 years of age or older can be vaccinated. The question about continuing to impose a federal mask requirement is, are we slowing down the people who choose not to get vaccinated and who may infect others who choose not to get vaccinated.

Of course, children under 12 cannot yet be vaccinated, but they are statistically less likely to die from Covid-19 than older vaccinated Americans (in fact, a child between the ages of 1 and 4 is 10 times more likely to die from homicide or cancer than from Covid-19).

Lake View from the Wing

federal mask mandate expiration datesupreme courtairline news,People also search for,Privacy settings,How Search works,federal mask mandate expiration date,supreme court,airline news

You May Also Like

Road Trip From San Diego To San Francisco

Since the news out of San Diego that the Chargers had lost…

The Florida Keys Unveils New and Enhanced Tourism Offerings

The Florida Keys are known for their natural beauty and pristine white…

Judge Quickly Dismisses CDC’s Appeal on Conditional Sailing Order Injunction

On Thursday, July 16, 2011, Judge Charles R. Breyer of the U.S.…

75% of Americans Would Choose Travel Advisors Over Computers, Survey Finds

According to a new survey, 75% of Americans would rather consult a…